Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
5041827 Consciousness and Cognition 2017 14 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Gives a non-technical exposition of the prediction-error coding theory of attention.•Explains the motivation for using precision-expectation to explain attention.•Argues that a precision-expectation-based theory of attention cannot be complete.

It has recently become popular to suggest that cognition can be explained as a process of Bayesian prediction error minimization. Some advocates of this view propose that attention should be understood as the optimization of expected precisions in the prediction-error signal (Clark, 2013, 2016; Feldman & Friston, 2010; Hohwy, 2012, 2013). This proposal successfully accounts for several attention-related phenomena. We claim that it cannot account for all of them, since there are certain forms of voluntary attention that it cannot accommodate. We therefore suggest that, although the theory of Bayesian prediction error minimization introduces some powerful tools for the explanation of mental phenomena, its advocates have been wrong to claim that Bayesian prediction error minimization is 'all the brain ever does'.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Cognitive Neuroscience
Authors
, , ,