Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5058062 | Economics Letters | 2016 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
â¢The paper uniquely models pre-emptive mergers in which downstream costs differ.â¢When the downstream cost difference is large enough, the horizontal merger dominates.â¢This reverses the finding that vertical integration dominates for identical downstream costs.â¢When downstream products are complements, the upstream firm rarely bids.â¢This failure reflects the upstream firm's gain from the horizontal merger eliminating a bottleneck.
With sufficient downstream cost asymmetry a horizontal merger will be chosen over a vertical merger. This results because the technology transfer is large and the incentive to vertically merge shrinks as the horizontal merger eliminates a cost asymmetry induced “bottleneck.”
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Economics and Econometrics
Authors
J. Alejandro Gelves, John S. Heywood,