Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5058211 | Economics Letters | 2016 | 5 Pages |
â¢Evaluates the power of Indirect Inference testing in small samples.â¢Evaluates three different and widely-considered auxiliary models: VAR, Moments and Impulse Response Functions (IRFs).â¢Finds that VAR and IRFs invariably give similar power.â¢Finds that Moments gives similar power to the other two for simple macro model but considerably less power for a large macro model.
Indirect inference testing can be carried out with a variety of auxiliary models. Asymptotically these different models make no difference. However, in small samples power can differ. We explore small sample power with three different auxiliary models: a VAR, average Impulse Response Functions and Moments. The latter corresponds to the Simulated Moments Method. We find that in a small macro model there is no difference in power. But in a large complex macro model the power with Moments rises more slowly with increasing misspecification than with the other two which remain similar.