Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
5058403 Economics Letters 2016 4 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Poor households spend a larger share of their income on carbon intensive goods.•Therefore carbon taxation is often considered regressive.•We use a small analytical model in which we analyze this hypothesis.•We compare the distributional impacts of 3 distinct designs of a carbon tax reform.•A carbon tax reform can be both re- or progressive, depending on its design.

This letter analyzes the distributional effects of a carbon tax reform when households must consume carbon-intensive goods above a subsistence level. The reform is progressive if revenues are recycled as uniform lump-sum transfers, in other cases it is regressive.

Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Economics, Econometrics and Finance Economics and Econometrics
Authors
, ,