| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5061273 | Economics Letters | 2010 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
This paper provides a theoretical model for analyzing the behavior of peer-reviewed journals. It finds that, apart from natural human errors, inefficiencies arise purely for reasons of inter-journal strategic behavior. Specifically, as a result of competition, journals tend to set their quality cut-offs excessively low.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Economics and Econometrics
Authors
Vidya Atal,