Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5068258 | European Journal of Political Economy | 2011 | 19 Pages |
This paper evaluates the effectiveness of the international naval mission in the Gulf of Aden from 2008 to 2010, both in terms of its counter-piracy and its counter-terrorism objectives. We draw on arguments developed in the literature of terrorism and law and economics, detailed statistical analyses and a large number of in depth interviews. Counter-piracy operations are a qualified success: their main effects are the stabilisation of attacks at a high level and the substitution between the relatively well protected transit corridor in the Gulf of Aden and the open sea. However, the counter-piracy measures deterred pirates from forming alliances with Islamist movements and may therefore made a major contribution to international security.
Research highlights⺠Naval counter-piracy measures off the Horn of Africa have had limited success. ⺠Somali pirates are highly strategic in managing and mitigating risks. ⺠Pirates substitute between targets and attack locations to minimise risk of disruption. ⺠Pirates have resisted forming alliances with Islamists.