Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5068310 | European Journal of Political Economy | 2008 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
A conservative central banker, who puts more weight on inflation stabilization than the social planner, solves the stabilization bias of discretionary monetary policy. This note shows that the welfare costs of deviating from the optimal degree of monetary conservatism are asymmetric. A too conservative central banker is more costly than a too liberal central banker.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Economics and Econometrics
Authors
Peter Tillmann,