Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5072211 | Games and Economic Behavior | 2012 | 19 Pages |
Abstract
We prove that for any equilibrium of a (Bayesian) game, and any sequence of perturbations of that game, there exists a corresponding sequence of ex-ante ε-equilibria converging to the given equilibrium of the original game. We strengthen the conclusion to show that the approaching equilibria are interim ε-equilibria (ε-best responses for almost all types) if beliefs in the perturbed games converge in a strong-enough sense to the limit beliefs. Therefore, equilibrium selection arguments that are based on perturbations to a game are not robust to slight perturbations in best reply behavior (or to underlying preferences). This applies to many standard equilibrium selections, including Seltenʼs (1975) definition of trembling-hand perfect equilibrium, Rubinsteinʼs (1989) analysis of the electronic mail game, and Carlsson and van Dammeʼs (1993) global games analysis, among others.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Economics and Econometrics
Authors
Matthew O. Jackson, Tomas Rodriguez-Barraquer, Xu Tan,