History and regional development. A controversy over the 'right' interpretation of the role of history in the development of the Polish regions

There is currently a lively discussion on the role of historic memories and the re-visiting of historic legacies in post-communist countries. Using the example of Poland and its legacy of the tripartite division of the 19th century, this paper aims to illustrate how symbolic conflicts over identity politics and the interpretation of history may critically influence discourses on the debates on, and portrayals of, variations in regional development. The paper thus discusses the post-war history of Poland in the context of the so-called left-right political cleavage, and the varying related debates on the 'quality' of regional development as part of Poland's post-communist restructuring. These discussions include varying projections of the nature and role of social capital and its relative 'usefulness' for a successful development Poland's after communism. And there are clear political overtones to these contrasting portrayals of Poland's history and its regionally varying legacy. Drawing on different definitions of the notion of social capital, the paper then discusses how different legacies, such as an introspective and extrovert outlook of population and institutions, and the degree of cohesion among them, circumscribes a region's economic development prospects.