Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5076411 | Insurance: Mathematics and Economics | 2015 | 30 Pages |
Abstract
For a retiree who must maintain both investment and longevity risks, we consider the impact on decision making of focusing on an objective relating to the terminal wealth at retirement, instead of a more correct objective relating to a retirement income. Both a shortfall and a utility objective are considered; we argue that shortfall objectives may be inappropriate due to distortion in results with non-monotonically correlated economic factors. The modelling undertaken uses a dynamic programming approach in conjunction with Monte-Carlo simulations of future experience of an individual to make optimal choices. We find that the type of objective targetted can have a significant impact on the optimal choices made, with optimal equity allocations being up to 30% higher and contribution amounts also being significantly higher under a retirement income objective as compared to a terminal wealth objective. The result of these differences can have a significant impact on retirement outcomes.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Mathematics
Statistics and Probability
Authors
Adam Butt, Gaurav Khemka,