Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5091002 | Journal of Banking & Finance | 2008 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
This note corrects the welfare calculations in Chui, Gai and Haldane's paper on sovereign liquidity crisis [Chui, M., Gai, P., Haldane, A.G., 2002. Sovereign liquidity crisis: Analytics and implications for public policy. Journal of Banking and Finance 26, 519-544]. We show that the exact formula not only dramatically reduces the computed welfare consequences from 66% of ex-ante expected output to roughly 13%, but also changes the direction of some reported comparative static results. In addition, we clarify the difference between fundamentals-driven and belief-driven welfare costs and extend some of the sensitivity calculations.
Keywords
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Economics and Econometrics
Authors
Dina Dreisbach, Fabian Kindermann,