Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5101854 | Journal of Public Economics | 2017 | 15 Pages |
Abstract
This paper compares the Comprehensive Business Income Tax (CBIT) and the Allowance for Corporate Equity tax (ACE) under imperfect competition using an oligopoly Salop model and a monopolistic competition model. A key insight is that the effect of a switch to either tax system depends on technology and the intensity of competition. Both tax systems are distortionary when entry is endogenous. Using the Salop model, we show that ACE (CBIT) tends to improve welfare in decreasing returns (increasing returns) to scale industries, whereas the two regimes are welfare neutral in constant returns to scale industries.
Keywords
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Economics and Econometrics
Authors
Kurt R. Brekke, Armando J. Garcia Pires, Dirk Schindler, Guttorm Schjelderup,