Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5114195 | Quaternary International | 2016 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Anthropic fracture of avian bones has received scarce experimental attention. Prehistoric bird consumption is assumed from references in studies of lagomorphs or small mammals, despite the fact that avian bones are quite different from those of mammals and rodents. Their consumption by humans can be addressed experimentally. This paper presents the results of a study in which fresh chicken (Gallus) thighs were fractured using hands and teeth, with no technological assistance. Results showed that fractures are different from those of larger animals, resulting in the proposal of a new classification of fragments. The location of the fracture influences its line and angle and, above all, the ensuing splintering. The fracture types and characteristics of notches, tooth marks, scores and depressions have led the authors to propose a model of fragmentation and marks that can be applied to avian remains at archaeological sites.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Geology
Authors
Antonio J. Romero, J. Carlos DÃez, Laura RodrÃguez, Diego Arceredillo,