Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5115367 | Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability | 2017 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
Nature is perceived and valued in starkly different and often conflicting ways. This paper presents the rationale for the inclusive valuation of nature's contributions to people (NCP) in decision making, as well as broad methodological steps for doing so. While developed within the context of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), this approach is more widely applicable to initiatives at the knowledge-policy interface, which require a pluralistic approach to recognizing the diversity of values. We argue that transformative practices aiming at sustainable futures would benefit from embracing such diversity, which require recognizing and addressing power relationships across stakeholder groups that hold different values on human nature-relations and NCP.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Earth and Planetary Sciences (General)
Authors
Unai Pascual, Patricia Balvanera, Sandra DÃaz, György Pataki, Eva Roth, Marie Stenseke, Robert T Watson, Esra BaÅak Dessane, Mine Islar, Eszter Kelemen, Virginie Maris, Martin Quaas, Suneetha M Subramanian, Heidi Wittmer, Asia Adlan, SoEun Ahn,