Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
5120294 Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2017 6 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Participants were receptive (73%-84%) to the SmartQuit 2.0 smoking cessation app.•The app's quit rate was 21% (7D PP) and smoking reduction rate was high (75%).•Program completers had high quit (33% 7D PP) and reduction rates (88%).•SmartQuit 2.0 had higher receptivity and reduction rates than SmartQuit 1.0.

BackgroundThe first randomized trial of a smartphone application (app) for adult smoking cessation (SmartQuit 1.0) revealed key features that predict cessation. These findings guided the revision of this Acceptance & Commitment Therapy (ACT)-based application (SmartQuit 2.0), which was primarily tested to examine participant receptivity, short-term cessation and reduction, and the relationship between program completion, smoking cessation and reduction. Secondarily, outcomes were descriptively compared with the SmartQuit1.0 trial.MethodAdult participants (78% female, 25% with high school or less education, 30% unemployed) were recruited into the single-arm pilot trial (N = 99) of SmartQuit 2.0 with a two-month follow-up (85% retention).ResultsRegarding receptivity, 84% of participants were satisfied with SmartQuit 2.0 (vs. 59% for SmartQuit1.0), 73% would recommend it to a friend (vs. 48% for SmartQuit1.0), 81% found the ACT exercises useful for quitting (vs. 44% for SmartQuit1.0). At the 2-month follow-up, the quit rates were 21% for 7-day point prevalence (vs. 23% for SmartQuit1.0), 11% for 30-day point prevalence (vs. 13% for SmartQuit1.0), and 75% of participants reduced their smoking frequency (vs. 57% for SmartQuit1.0). Among program completers (24% of total sample), the quit rates were 33% for 7-day point prevalence, 28% for 30-day point prevalence, and 88% of participants reduced their smoking frequency.ConclusionsThe revised app had high user receptivity, modest quit rates, and high smoking reduction rates. Program completion may be key to boosting the app's effectiveness.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Behavioral Neuroscience
Authors
, , , , , , ,