Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5127596 | Computers & Industrial Engineering | 2017 | 10 Pages |
â¢We examine cost versus robustness tradeoffs of multiple cross training strategies.â¢We consider robustness for cross training to cover both demand mix and absenteeism.â¢Tradeoffs exist, whereby minimizing costs may cause unmet demand.â¢Equalizing cross training is more robust than solely minimizing costs.
We assess alternative cross-training policies for work-teams considering cost, and levels of cross training. The policies are assessed with respect to their robustness to demand-mix variation and absenteeism coverage. We employ simulation to examine instances where cross training can be used to help meet a fixed demand scenario, and with instances where cross-training can help to meet demand mix variability. Current results indicate that when minimizing cross-training costs, policies related to equalizing the cross-training level among the workforce, may provide improvement in terms of robustness without additional cost. We also assess the effects of some environmental factors, demand mix-coverage, absenteeism coverage, and job-task correlation.