Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5403677 | Journal of Luminescence | 2008 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
Electroluminescence (EL) mechanism of dye-doped organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) was investigated by using three familiar fluorescent dyes, i.e., 5,12-Dihydro-5,12-dimethylquino [2,3-b]acridine-7,14-dione (DMQA), 4-(dicyanomethylene)-2-t-butyl-6(1,1,7,7-tetramethyljulolidyl-9-enyl)-4H-pyran (DCJTB), and 5,6,11,12-tetraphenylnaphthacene (Rubrene). EL spectra of the doped devices with structure of indium tin oxide (ITO)/N,Nâ²-bis-(1-naphthyl)-N,Nâ²-diphenyl-1,1â²-biphenyl-4,4â²- diamine (NPB) (40 nm)/tris-(8-hydroxyquinolate)-aluminum (Alq3) (x nm, x=0-40 nm)/dye: Alq3 (weight ratioâ1%, 2 nm)/Alq3 (48âx nm)/MgAg indicated that direct carrier trapping (DCT) process dominated light emission of devices. As a result, investigation of carrier-recombination site via doping, which is conventionally applied in OLEDs, is questionable since the doping site and the dopant itself may significantly influence the carrier-recombination process in the doped devices.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Chemistry
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
Authors
Weizhi Li, Yadong Jiang, Tao Wang,