Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
5428645 Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 2013 11 Pages PDF
Abstract

•The water vapour self-continuum is measured by CRDS at room temperature near 1.6 µm.•The real time pressure dependence of the continuum was studied during pressure cycles.•The contribution of water adsorbed on the mirrors was identified and subtracted.•The Cs(T=296 K) values range between 3×10−25 and 3×10−24 cm2 molecule−1 atm−1.•The derived self-continuum cross sections agree reasonably with the MT_CKD 2.5 model.

The water vapour self-continuum has been investigated by high sensitivity Cavity Ring Down Spectroscopy at room temperature in the 1.6 µm window. The real time pressure dependence of the continuum was investigated during pressure cycles up to 12 Torr for fifteen selected wavenumber values. The continuum absorption coefficient measured between 5875 and 6450 cm−1 shows a minimum value around 6300 cm−1 and ranges between 1×10−9 and 8×10−9 cm−1 for 8 Torr of water vapour. The continuum level is observed to deviate significantly from the expected quadratic dependence versus the pressure. This deviation is interpreted as due to a significant contribution of water adsorbed on the super mirrors to the cavity loss rate. The pressure dependence is well reproduced by a second order polynomial. We interpret the linear and quadratic terms as the adsorbed water and vapour water contribution, respectively.The derived self-continuum cross sections, Cs(T=296 K), ranging between 3×10−25 and 3×10−24 cm2 molecule−1 atm−1 are found in reasonable agreement with the last version of the MT_CKD 2.5 model but in disagreement with recent FTS measurements. The FTS cross section values are between one and two orders of magnitude higher than our values and mostly frequency independent over the investigated spectral region. The achieved baseline stability of the CRDS spectra (better than 1×10−10 cm−1) level totally rules out water continuum absorption at the FTS level (1.2×10−7 cm−1 at 9 Torr) in the CRDS cell. In order to find the origin of such conflicting results, the differences and possible experimental biases in the two measurement methods are discussed.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemistry Spectroscopy
Authors
, , , ,