Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
5446690 Energy Procedia 2016 12 Pages PDF
Abstract
This integrated analysis finds, that the higher energy consumption of FCEVs could not be compensated by system benefits like Power2Gas and grid storage. The result is consistent with a similar analysis of a community in California. The simulation results reveal, that while the two vehicle types enable similar CO2 emission reductions, these can be realized at lower costs with BEVs than with FCEVs. The most striking observation was, that in the event seasonal H2 grid storage becomes necessary, FCEVs would in fact be less favorable than BEVs, which require less energy per km traveled and therefore leave more energy available for stationary applications.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Energy Energy (General)
Authors
, , , ,