Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5466699 | Ultramicroscopy | 2017 | 12 Pages |
Abstract
The results indicate that in general, scanning electron microscopy is suitable for large nanoparticles (above 50â¯nm in diameter), while AFM and TEM can also give accurate results with smaller nanoparticles. DLS reveals details about the particles' solution dynamics, but is inappropriate for polydisperse samples, or mixtures of differently sized samples. SEM was also found to be more suitable to metallic particles, compared to oxide-based and polymeric nanoparticles. The conclusions drawn from the data in this paper can help nanoparticle researchers choose the most appropriate technique to characterize the dimensions of nanoparticle samples.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Materials Science
Nanotechnology
Authors
P. Eaton, P. Quaresma, C. Soares, C. Neves, M.P. de Almeida, E. Pereira, P. West,