Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5475615 | Energy | 2017 | 38 Pages |
Abstract
From the multi-criteria analysis, no single technology pathway was given preference. However, the choice of substrate was found to be a critical factor in comparing the technology options. Within biochemical conversion, organic waste alternatives were favoured, for the thermochemical conversion, residual forest wood. The goal, a comprehensive comparison of two different conversion pathways on a multi-criteria scale, was achieved, and has thus provided added value for the bioeconomy and biorefinery in research and policy aspects. Further, the methodology is expandable and transferable to other criteria and technologies.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Energy
Energy (General)
Authors
E. Billig, D. Thraen,