Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5476968 | Energy | 2017 | 90 Pages |
Abstract
The results of the case study were presented on different time bases (days, weeks, years). Such results show that the ELT control strategy can achieve a better profitability, with a simple payback period, SPB, equal to 4 years. For this strategy, 256 simulations were also performed by varying the main model parameters, in order to determine the combination showing the lowest SPB value and the highest Primary Energy Saving (PES) value. The optimum and the analysis of the optimum response surface was obtained by using Design of Experiments (DoE) method, showing that the best SPB value, equal to 3.9 years, comes out choosing an engine capacity ratio equal to 1, an ACH capacity ratio equal to 1, a hot tank volume equal to 5Â m3 and a cold tank volume equal to 2Â m3. The best PES value, instead, is equal to 20.6% and comes out selecting an engine capacity ratio equal to 0.5, an ACH capacity ratio equal to 1, a hot tank volume equal to 6Â m3 and a cold tank volume equal to 2Â m3.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Energy
Energy (General)
Authors
Francesco Calise, Massimo Dentice d'Accadia, Luigi Libertini, Edoardo Quiriti, Maria Vicidomini,