Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5480307 | Journal of Cleaner Production | 2017 | 52 Pages |
Abstract
The impact of the inclusion of CO2 capture and conditioning in the cost of cement shows that public financial support will be required to ensure that the plant remain competitive under current cement market price. Finally, comparison of the full-scale capture versus part-scale capture shows, in this case, that the economies of scale are nearly compensated by the additional steam cost, therefore limiting the interest for full-scale implementation. However, joint deployment with the two other CCS potential sites in Norway (Yara and Klemenstrud) may bring more synergies.
Keywords
MEANETLCCSfree on boardGWPZEPFOBSRDCAPEXTRLAPIFSCCEPCISaline aquiferNational Energy Technology LaboratoryEOREnhanced oil recoveryCarbon capture and storageCO2 captureCO2 transportFeedCO2 storageTechnology Readiness LevelChemical Engineering Plant Cost IndexCement industryAmerican Petroleum InstituteCapital expenditureglobal warming potential
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Energy
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Authors
Jana Jakobsen, Simon Roussanaly, Rahul Anantharaman,