Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5486398 | Advances in Space Research | 2017 | 12 Pages |
Abstract
In almost all cases the modelling accuracy was better than 12 TECU, having the biggest radius from the data ingestion point. Modelling accuracy better than 6 TECU was achieved within reduced radius in all observed periods, while accuracy better than 3 TECU was reached only in summer. The calculated radii and interpolated error levels were presented on maps. That was especially useful in analyzing the model performance during the strongest geomagnetic storms of the observed period, with each of them having unique development and influence on model accuracy. Although some of the storms severely degraded the model accuracy, during most of the disturbed periods the model could be used, but with lower accuracy than in the quiet geomagnetic conditions. The comprehensive analysis of locally adapted NeQuick 2 model performance highlighted the challenges of using the single point data ingestion applied to a large region in middle latitudes and determined the achievable radii for different error thresholds in various ionospheric conditions.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Space and Planetary Science
Authors
Josip VukoviÄ, Tomislav Kos,