| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5492669 | Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment | 2017 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
This study compares three methods to quantify the statistical uncertainty of the estimated mass: the bootstrap method, propagation of variance through moments, and statistical analysis of cycle data method. Each of the three methods was implemented on a set of four different NMC measurements, held at the JRC-laboratory in Ispra, Italy, sampling four different Pu samples in a standard Plutonium Scrap Multiplicity Counter (PSMC) well counter.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Physics and Astronomy
Instrumentation
Authors
C. Dubi, S. Croft, A. Favalli, A. Ocherashvili, B. Pedersen,