Outcome disparities by insurance type for patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia

•Survival for patients with AML is lower for patients with no insurance or Medicaid.•Known demographic factors affecting AML prognosis do not explain the differences.•Increased insurance coverage may reduce AML mortality.

Survival for patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) has increased during the past two decades. However, socioeconomic disparities may affect survival for some patient populations. We examine survival by insurance type for patients with AML. Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database we estimated survival according to insurance status (no insurance, Medicaid, and other insurance) for patients diagnosed with AML in the United States in 2007-2013. One, 3-, and 5-year survival was lower for patients with no insurance and Medicaid than for patients with other insurance. Five-year survival estimates were 24.7%, 25.6%, and 35.7%, respectively, for patients with Medicaid, no insurance, and other insurance. After adjustment, hazard ratios of 1.46 for uninsured and 1.35 for Medicaid compared to other insurance for overall survival and 1.50 for uninsured and 1.30 for Medicaid compared to other insurance for AML-specific survival were observed. Similar results were seen in all ages and both genders. Patients with no insurance or Medicaid have lower survival expectations after diagnosis with AML than patients with other insurance. Further research into reasons for the poor outcomes for Medicaid patients and continued reduction of number of uninsured people are urgently needed to improve population-level outcomes for AML.