Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
5572725 EXPLORE: The Journal of Science and Healing 2017 10 Pages PDF
Abstract
This brief report is a response to the article by Peter Bancel entitled “Searching for Global Consciousness: A Seventeen Year Exploration” in which he compares a goal orientation (GO) model with a field-like model he refers to as global consciousness (GC). He first attempts to exclude the latter, and then presents selected tests that compare the models. While the article appears to provide support for Bancel׳s conclusion that GC cannot explain the data and must be supplanted by GO, there are good reasons to believe this conclusion is premature at best. I address the vulnerable assumptions underlying Bancel׳s rejection of GC, and then provide multiple examples of parametric structure in the data, which cannot be attributed to GO, but are amenable to explanation by field-like models.
Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Authors
,