Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5572725 | EXPLORE: The Journal of Science and Healing | 2017 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
This brief report is a response to the article by Peter Bancel entitled “Searching for Global Consciousness: A Seventeen Year Exploration” in which he compares a goal orientation (GO) model with a field-like model he refers to as global consciousness (GC). He first attempts to exclude the latter, and then presents selected tests that compare the models. While the article appears to provide support for Bancel׳s conclusion that GC cannot explain the data and must be supplanted by GO, there are good reasons to believe this conclusion is premature at best. I address the vulnerable assumptions underlying Bancel׳s rejection of GC, and then provide multiple examples of parametric structure in the data, which cannot be attributed to GO, but are amenable to explanation by field-like models.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Authors
Roger PhD,