Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
5582988 Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2017 7 Pages PDF
Abstract
While no significant differences were detected for maternal satisfaction or for most clinical outcomes, this meta-analysis remains underpowered to rule out clinically-important differences due to the few existing randomized trials. For obstetric patients who are not candidates for EA, R-PCA may provide an alternative for analgesia in the peri-partum period, but caution is warranted particularly regarding hypoxemia, and suggests the need for increased surveillance and monitoring for R-PCA. Further adequately powered randomized trials with a focus on clinically-relevant maternal and neonatal outcomes are required to more accurately characterize the relative benefits and risks of R-PCA versus EA in this population.
Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Authors
, , , , , , , , ,