Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5594183 | Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology | 2017 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Positive pressure ventilation (PPV) is a fundamental life support measure, but it decreases cardiac output (CO). Diaphragmatic contractions produce negative intrathoracic and positive abdominal pressures, promoting splanchnic venous return. We hypothesized that: 1) diaphragm pacing alone could produce adequate ventilation without decreasing CO; 2) diaphragm pacing on top of PPV could improve CO. Of 11 anesthetized and mechanically ventilated ewes (39.6 ± 5.9 kg), 3 were discarded from analysis because of hemodynamic instability during the experiment, and 8 retained for analysis. Phrenic stimulation electrodes were inserted in the diaphragm (implanted phrenic nerve stimulation, iPS). CO was measured by the thermodilution technique (pulmonary artery catheter). CO during end-expiratory apnea served as reference. Median CO was 9.77 [6.25-11.25] l minâ1 during end-expiratory apnea, 8.25 [5.06-9.25] l minâ1 during “PPV” (â15%) (p < 0.05), 9.19 [5.60-10.19] l minâ1 during “PPV-iPS” (NS vs apnea) and 9.37 [6.12-10.48] l minâ1 during “iPS” (NS vs. apnea). iPS-driven ventilation was comparable to its PPV counterpart (median 92% [74-97], NS). Diaphragm pacing alone can produce adequate ventilation without reducing CO. Superimposed onto PPV, diaphragm pacing can reduce the PPV-induced decrease in CO.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Physiology
Authors
Hicham Masmoudi, Romain Persichini, Jérôme Cecchini, Julie Delemazure, Martin Dres, Julien Mayaux, Alexandre Demoule, Jalal Assouad, Thomas Similowski,