Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5604388 | International Journal of Cardiology | 2017 | 29 Pages |
Abstract
Rates of scaffold thrombosis after bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) implantation are reported to be higher than after metallic stent (DES) implantation. Thus, second scaffold generations with lower strut thickness might have potential advantages in terms of flow disturbance. We aimed to evaluate the acute performance of a novolimus-eluting BRS with different strut thickness (DESolve system 150 and 100) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in terms of appropriate scaffold deployment. OCT showed similar post-procedural scaffold geometry and outcome indicating that both BRS may be implanted with good acute performance. However, the data suggest a decreased radial strength for the 100 μm BRS.
Keywords
QCARASRVABRSMLDMLAarea stenosisRVDPCIStrut thicknessMACEIVUSquantitative coronary angiographyDESOctOptical coherence tomographymajor adverse cardiac eventsbioresorbable scaffoldintravascular ultrasoundminimum lumen diameterreference vessel diameterpercutaneous coronary interventionminimal lumen areaISA
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
Niklas F. Boeder, Oliver Dörr, Timm Bauer, Alessio Mattesini, Albrecht Elsässer, Christoph Liebetrau, Stephan Achenbach, Christian W. Hamm, Holger M. Nef,