| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5605608 | International Journal of Cardiology | 2017 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
CFVR had a good repeatability, but the agreement between CFVR and MBFR was modest. Divergence could be due to methodology differences; TTDE estimates flow velocities whereas PET estimates myocardial blood flow.
Keywords
MBfRCMDTTDECFVRCAGMBFCFVCoronary angiographyCoronary microvascular dysfunctionTransthoracic Doppler echocardiographycoronary artery diseasePositron emission tomographyRepeatabilityReproducibilityMyocardial blood flowcoronary flow velocity reservecoronary flow velocityCADLADPETleft anterior descending artery
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
Marie Mide Michelsen, Naja Dam Mygind, Adam Pena, Rasmus Huan Olsen, Thomas Emil Christensen, Adam Ali Ghotbi, Philip Hasbak, Andreas Kjaer, Ida Gustafsson, Peter Riis Hansen, Henrik Steen Hansen, Nis Høst, Jens Kastrup, Eva Prescott,