| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5605721 | International Journal of Cardiology | 2017 | 7 Pages | 
Abstract
												The intuitive decision-making for choosing the optimal myocardial revascularization method differed predominantly from the SSII recommendation for CABG. The discordance between the SSII recommended revascularization strategy and the clinical decision was associated with a higher 4-year mortality i.e. one life may be saved if SSII would be calculated and followed consequently in 18 patients.
											Keywords
												EGFRULMCASYNTAX score IILVEFPCIEuropean Society of Cardiologystandard deviationfirst quartilecoronary artery diseaseCOPDChronic obstructive pulmonary diseasecoronary artery bypass graftingHeart TeamCABGSyntaxESCthird quartileUnprotected left main coronary arteryCADMyocardial revascularizationAll-cause mortalityconfidence intervalClinical judgementpercutaneous coronary interventionestimated glomerular filtration rateSynergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgeryleft ventricular ejection fraction
												Related Topics
												
													Health Sciences
													Medicine and Dentistry
													Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
												
											Authors
												Bojan M. Stanetic, Miodrag Ostojic, Carlos M. Campos, Jelena Marinkovic, Vasim Farooq, Tamara Kovacevic-Preradovic, Kurt Huber, Patrick W. Serruys, 
											