Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5611756 | Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography | 2006 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
We sought to evaluate whether the combination of phantom E wave peak velocity (Ep) to phantom A wave peak velocity (Ap) ratio at the apex (Ep/Ap) and pulsed wave Doppler left ventricular (LV) inflow propagation velocity (LVIPVpw) or the combination of Ep/Ap and Ep/LVIPVpw obtained from the same heartbeat can effectively differentiate LV filling patterns. The study population included 132 patients. They were classified into normal, abnormal relaxation, and pseudonormal/restrictive groups according to the ratio of early to late transmittal filling wave peak velocity (E/A), color M-mode Doppler LV inflow propagation velocity, and E/color M-mode Doppler LV inflow propagation velocity. Standard Doppler parameters of LV filling such as E, A, E/A, and E-wave deceleration time had a bimodal distribution, but LVIPVpw decreased and Ep/LVIPVpw increased progressively with worsening of LV diastolic function (both P < .001). The sensitivity and specificity of combination of Ep/Ap 1 or greater and LVIPVpw less than 77 cm/s or of Ep/Ap 1 or greater and Ep/LVIPVpw greater than 0.87 from the same heartbeat in identifying the pseudonormal/restrictive LV filling pattern were 81% and 95% or 81% and 93%, respectively. In conclusion, with application of range ambiguity phenomenon, it is simple and feasible to differentiate LV filling patterns on the same cardiac cycle by pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
Ho-Ming MD, Tsung-Hsien MD, Wen-Chol MD, Kun-Tai MD, Chih-Sheng MD, Hsueh-Wei MD, Wen-Ter MD, Sheng-Hsiung MD,