| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5612662 | Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography | 2012 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
In a large population of patients with STEMI, GLS and WMSI were comparable and both superior for early risk assessment compared with volume-based left ventricular function indicators such as LVEF and ESVI. Compared with WMSI, the advantage of GLS is the provision of a semiautomated quantitative measure.
Keywords
ESVIWMSIROCGLSPCILVEFSTEMIAUCMyocardial infarctionST-segment elevation myocardial infarctionLeft ventricularTwo-dimensional strainend-systolic volume indexwall motion score indexconfidence intervalGlobal longitudinal strainpercutaneous coronary interventionarea under the curvehazard ratioprognosisleft ventricular ejection fractionreceiver operating characteristic
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
Kim MD, PhD, Niels H. MD, PhD, Christian J. MD, PhD, Bo M. MSc, PhD, Søren P. MD, PhD, Hans E. MD, PhD, Torsten T. MD, DMSc, Steen H. MD, PhD,