| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5619818 | Resuscitation | 2017 | 41 Pages |
Abstract
Our results demonstrated that for adults, CPR 30:2 is associated with better survival and favourable neurological outcomes when compared to CPR 15:2. For children, more patients receiving CPR with either 15:2 or 30:2 compression-to ventilation ratio experienced favourable neurological function, survival, and ROSC when compared to CO-CPR for children of all ages, but for children <1Â years of age, no statistically significant differences were observed.
Keywords
EPOCCompression-only CPRBystander CPROHCAROSCRCTsEMSQuality of lifeRandomised controlled trialsCardiopulmonary resuscitationCPRstandard deviationCardiac arrestReturn of spontaneous circulationSurvivalVentilationEmergency medical serviceOut-of-hospital cardiac arrestconfidence intervalchest compressionPRESSGradeMicrRisk ratioodds ratio
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
Huda M. Ashoor, Erin Lillie, Wasifa Zarin, Ba' Pham, Paul A. Khan, Vera Nincic, Fatemeh Yazdi, Marco Ghassemi, John Ivory, Roberta Cardoso, Gavin D. Perkins, Allan R. de Caen, Andrea C. Tricco,