Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
5627653 Clinical Neurophysiology 2017 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Predicting neurological outcome after cardiac arrest remains a challenging task.•Bivariate EEG synchronization measures can contribute to early prognostication.•Further studies are needed to evaluate the place of quantitative EEG within multi-modal prognostic algorithms.

ObjectiveOutcome prognostication in comatose patients after cardiac arrest (CA) remains a major challenge. Here we investigated the prognostic value of combinations of linear and non-linear bivariate EEG synchronization measures.Methods94 comatose patients with EEG within 24 h after CA were included. Clinical outcome was assessed at 3 months using the Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC). EEG synchronization between the left and right parasagittal, and between the frontal and parietal brain regions was assessed with 4 different quantitative measures (delta power asymmetry, cross-correlation, mutual information, and transfer entropy). 2/3 of patients were used to assess the predictive power of all possible combinations of these eight features (4 measures × 2 directions) using cross-validation. The predictive power of the best combination was tested on the remaining 1/3 of patients.ResultsThe best combination for prognostication consisted of 4 of the 8 features, and contained linear and non-linear measures. Predictive power for poor outcome (CPC 3-5), measured with the area under the ROC curve, was 0.84 during cross-validation, and 0.81 on the test set. At specificity of 1.0 the sensitivity was 0.54, and the accuracy 0.81.ConclusionCombinations of EEG synchronization measures can contribute to early prognostication after CA. In particular, combining linear and non-linear measures is important for good predictive power.SignificanceQuantitative methods might increase the prognostic yield of currently used multi-modal approaches.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Neurology
Authors
, , , , , , , , ,