Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5640198 | Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery | 2017 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
As both procedures lead to similar results in preventing or omitting possible later nodal metastasis, the two methods seem to be valuable alternatives. In conclusion, we recommend bilateral END because of advantages with regard to oncologic safety and esthetic outcome, but the decision for END should always be according to the patient's general health status, comorbidities, and individual tumor risk profile.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine
Authors
Christopher-Philipp Nobis, Sven Otto, Tamara Grigorieva, Mohamed Alnaqbi, Matthias Troeltzsch, Jakob Schöpe, Stefan Wagenpfeil, Michael Ehrenfeld, Klaus-Dietrich Wolff, Marco Rainer Kesting,