Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5640992 | Journal of Endodontics | 2017 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
For payers not willing to invest additional money for longer tooth retention, MP seemed most suitable to retain restorations. For payers with additional willingness to pay, GF seemed suitable, retaining teeth for longer. MC was only cost-effective under very high willingness to pay. CF is not recommendable on the basis of their cost-effectiveness.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine
Authors
Falk PhD, Michael Dr,