Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5641732 | Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | 2017 | 52 Pages |
Abstract
Although both hard tissue augmentation approaches provide an adequate volume of bone graft for implant insertion, IBG results in greater graft resorption at maxillary augmented sites than GBR. Clinicians should consider the differences in the extent of graft resorption between the two methods while choosing the treatment approach.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine
Authors
B. Alper DDS, PhD, Erol DDS, PhD, M. Oguz DDS, PhD,