Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5668394 | Journal of Hospital Infection | 2017 | 8 Pages |
SummaryBackgroundManufacturers' recommended dosages for alcohol-based hand rubs are typically determined by measuring product efficacy using a model protocol such as ENÂ 1500; however, anecdotal reports and informal observation suggests that in many cases users self-titrate to much lower doses in real-world application.AimTo examine the interdependence of alcohol-based hand-rub volume on in-vivo efficacy using the EN 1500 standard test method, on drying time on users' hands, and on their perceptions of acceptability.MethodsThree formulations were studied using EN 1500 and a modification of this method. The modification used volumes ranging from 0.5 to 3.0Â mL and 30Â s application. Drying times were recorded and user acceptability was established using a three-point scale (too long, OK, or too short). Dying times were analysed in relation to hand surface area.FindingsThe drying time for all three products increased as a function of volume. The drying time displayed a positive association with volume and a negative association with hand surface area. The optimum volume for user acceptability was between 1.5 and 2Â mL, yielding a drying time of between 20 and 30Â s.ConclusionWhereas EN 1500 is appropriate for establishing the efficacy of a hygienic hand-rub formulation compared to a benchmark, it does not reflect actual in-use conditions or the likely clinical effectiveness of the product. In particular, it fails to address the need to optimize the volume of application and user acceptability of the product.