| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5668941 | Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy | 2017 | 7 Pages |
ObjectivesThis study was designed to evaluate the sodium mercaptoacetic acid double disk synergy test (SMA-DDST), the Etest metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) MP/MPI (Etest MP/MPI), and the Mastdiscs ID Carbapenemase Detection Disc Set (MAST-CDS) for the detection of MBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates in Japan.MethodsFifty-one clinical isolates and four reference strains were tested. These isolates included 40, 4, and 11 IMP-, New Delhi MBL (NDM)-, and non-MBL-producers, respectively. SMA-DDST was performed with meropenem (MEPM)-containing disks.ResultsSensitivities were 38/44 (86%), 40/44 (91%), and 15/44 (34%), and the cost ratio was 1:9.4:3.8 for MEPM-SMA-DDST:Etest MP/MPI:MAST-CDS, respectively. The specificity was 11/11 (100%) for all assays. MEPM-SMA-DDST detected IMP-producing isolates with high sensitivity (38/40; 95%), but the assay was inadequate for NDM-producing isolates (0/4; 0%). The Etest MP/MPI detected both IMP- (36/40; 90%) and NDM-producing isolates (4/4; 100%), but was the most expensive. MAST-CDS detected IMP-producing isolates with low sensitivity (11/40; 28%), but the assay worked well for NDM-producing isolates (4/4; 100%).ConclusionsOur results indicated that MEPM-SMA-DDST was the most cost-effective assay for the detection of IMP-producing isolates. Therefore, we conclude that MEPM-SMA-DDST is the optimal available assay for clinical first-line screening in IMP-endemic areas such as Japan. However, this assay could not detect NDM-producing isolates, whereas the Etest MP/MPI and MAST-CDS could. When MEPM-SMA-DDST is negative, the Etest MP/MPI and MAST-CDS could be used to obtain supportive data and prevent detection failure for NDM-producing isolates.
