Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5692434 | European Urology | 2017 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
While some prostate cancers are slow-growing requiring many years, sometimes decades, of follow-up in order to compare between radiation and surgery, high-risk and very aggressive cancers follow a much shorter time course allowing such comparisons to be made and updated as treatments, especially radiation, rapidly evolve. We showed that radiation-based treatments and surgery, with contemporary standards, offer equivalent survival for patients with very aggressive cancers (defined as Gleason score 9-10). Extremely-dose escalated radiotherapy with short-course androgen deprivation therapy offered the least risk of developing metastases, and equivalent long term survival.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health
Authors
Amar U. Kishan, Talha Shaikh, Pin-Chieh Wang, Robert E. Reiter, Jonathan Said, Govind Raghavan, Nicholas G. Nickols, William J. Aronson, Ahmad Sadeghi, Mitchell Kamrava, David Jeffrey Demanes, Michael L. Steinberg, Eric M. Horwitz, Patrick A. Kupelian,