| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5702160 | Practical Radiation Oncology | 2017 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
On average, the difference between IGTVs derived from data-driven and standard 4D CT was not clinically relevant or statistically significant, suggesting data-driven 4D CT can be used in place of standard 4D CT without adjustments to IGTVs. The relatively large differences in some patients were usually attributed to limitations in automatic contouring or differences in artifacts. Artifact reduction and setup simplicity suggest a clinical advantage to data-driven 4D CT.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Oncology
Authors
Rachael BS, Tinsu PhD,