Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
5702273 Practical Radiation Oncology 2017 24 Pages PDF
Abstract
Our comparison of an established 2.5D USIG method with a newer, fully 3D approach for prostate alignment of 41 different patients (1428 fractions) shows excellent agreement with each other, despite the nontrivial difference in imaging approaches. This shows that the 2 specific USIG approaches yield results that are consistent with each other, and that the USIG modality yields consistent results within the modality.
Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Oncology
Authors
, , , , , , , , , , , ,