Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5702273 | Practical Radiation Oncology | 2017 | 24 Pages |
Abstract
Our comparison of an established 2.5D USIG method with a newer, fully 3D approach for prostate alignment of 41 different patients (1428 fractions) shows excellent agreement with each other, despite the nontrivial difference in imaging approaches. This shows that the 2 specific USIG approaches yield results that are consistent with each other, and that the USIG modality yields consistent results within the modality.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Oncology
Authors
Bill J. PhD, Martin PhD, Christine PhD, Vikren PhD, Prema PhD, Brian PhD, Hui PhD, Jessica PhD, Long PhD, Kris MD, Jonathan D. PhD, MD,