| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5704751 | Journal Français d'Ophtalmologie | 2017 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
Both SICS and PHACO give excellent results, both anatomical and refractive. However, SICS appears to be more advantageous than PHACO in terms of speed, cost, and independence from technology, and appears to be better suited to dense cataracts and mass surgery.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Ophthalmology
Authors
I. Ammous, E. Bouayed, S. Mabrouk, M. Boukari, K. Erraies, R. Zhioua,