Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5708597 | The Journal of Arthroplasty | 2017 | 23 Pages |
Abstract
Neither THA implant groups were able to return pelvis and hip kinematics to the level of CTRLs. The deficit of DM implants at the pelvis combined with the poorer functional scores should caution clinicians to use this implant design in active patients. SB design causes a larger hip abduction to reach their maximum squat depth. Post-THA rehabilitation should focus on improving joint range of motion and strength.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
Danilo S. MSc, Erik MSc, Paul E. MD, FRCSC, Mario PhD,