Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
5712972 The Spine Journal 2017 26 Pages PDF
Abstract
There has been no decrease in the number of new FDA-approved class III spinal devices since the turn of the century. The majority of devices have been for cervical arthroplasty. By contrast, biologic devices were most likely to go to panel and least likely to be approved after panel. The pivotal trials for nearly all devices were randomized, two-arm, noninferiority trials.
Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
, , , , ,