Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5726836 | Journal of the American College of Radiology | 2017 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
A 22.2% rate of clinically significant difference was observed between primary and secondary interpretations. The substantial rate of clinically relevant discrepancies demonstrates that subspecialty expertise often changed the primary diagnosis. Thus, by participating in a multidisciplinary team, subspecialty radiologists have a unique opportunity to help direct appropriate treatment plans.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Radiology and Imaging
Authors
Aleksandr MD, Barry E. MD, John A. MD, Kristin PA-C, Johannes B. MD, PhD, William B. MD, Adam C. MD,