| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5734662 | Surgery | 2017 | 7 Pages |
BackgroundBRAFV600E mutation has been investigated by immunohistochemistry and has shown high sensitivity and specificity. We aim to investigate the accuracy of immunohistochemistry versus molecular testing of BRAFV600E in papillary thyroid cancer using a large number of polymerase chain reaction-positive BRAFV600E papillary thyroid cancer tissues.MethodsWe stained 130 formalin-fixed papillary thyroid cancer specimens using the VE1 antibody: 100 BRAFV600E positive and 30 BRAFV600E negative confirmed by PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the antibody were assessed.ResultsImmunohistochemistry of BRAFV600E showed 98.0% sensitivity, 93.3% specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 98.0% and 93.3%, respectively. Of 100 patients with BRAFV600E PCR-positive samples, 97 (97.0%) had cytoplasmic weak (4.0%), moderate (17.0%), and strong (76.0%) immunostaining. In BRAFV600E PCR-negative samples, cytoplasmic staining was not detected in 93.3% (28/30) of papillary thyroid cancer tissues. The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated a high validity and comparable immunohistochemistry method (area under the curve = 98.8%) compared with PCR testing.ConclusionThe use of VE1 immunohistochemistry for the detection of BRAFV600E in papillary thyroid cancer tissues is a clinically applicable method with high specificity, sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values. The reliable use of BRAFV600E immunohistochemistry should promulgate the routine use of this method for BRAFV600E detection in papillary thyroid cancer tissues.
