Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
574944 Journal of Chemical Health and Safety 2006 5 Pages PDF
Abstract
A survey of 14 Department of Energy (DOE) sites was performed to identify methodology used in the selection of airborne release fraction (ARF) and respirable fraction (RF) values for chemicals that are used to evaluate concentration exposures (i.e., consequences) for workers and public from accidental release of toxic chemical particulate material. Approximately half of the surveyed sites do not use ARF/RF values because they handle small quantities of chemicals, which are below the threshold planning quantities (TPQs) of 40 CFR 355 and threshold quantities (TQs) of 29 CFR 1910.119, where quantitative concentration (consequence) analysis is not usually performed. The sites that use ARF/RF values for chemicals typically use values that are based on DOE-HDBK-3010-941 that were developed for plutonium and uranium, which may not always be applicable and thus not be reliable. Guidance on ARF/RF use for toxic chemicals based on DOE-HDBK-3010-94 values is discussed in terms of density, particle size, deposition rate, and other properties.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemical Engineering Chemical Health and Safety
Authors
, , ,